After the Philosophy of Mind : Replacing Scholasticism with Science
نویسندگان
چکیده
We provide a taxonomy of the two most important debates in the philosophy of the cognitive and neural sciences. The first debate is over methodological individualism: is the object of the cognitive and neural sciences the brain, the whole animal, or the animal--environment system? The second is over explanatory style: should explanation in cognitive and neural science be reductionist-mechanistic, inter-level mechanistic, or dynamical? After setting out the debates, we discuss the ways in which they are interconnected. Finally, we make some recommendations that we hope will help philosophers interested in the cognitive and neural sciences to avoid dead ends. _____________________________________________________________________________________
منابع مشابه
Indian Philosophy of Mind: A Comparative Study
In this paper I explore surprising parallels in the arguments between dualists and materialists in the philosophy of mind in India and the West. In particular, I compare the Nyaya School of India with Cartesian dualism and its Western defenders and the Carvaka School of India with contemporary Western materialists.
متن کاملZarathrustrian Mind: Some Comparative Reflections on the Philosophy of Zarathrustra
This paper deals with an essential problem which the modern western thinker faced with and tried to find a solution for that in the benefit of modern humanity. This problem is human reason and his free mind. The author tries here to go back to Zarathrustrian concept of mind and bring forth some fresh reflections in a comparative way. This will let him to evaluate in the main the view that argue...
متن کاملThe Significance of Comparative
BEFORE discussing the role and significance of comparative philosophy for the study of Islamic philosophy, it is necessary to define exactly what we mean by comparative philosophy, for only too often today facile comparisons are made between Oriental metaphysical doctrines of a sacred nature and secular modern philosophies without the least consideration for the basic difference in the nature o...
متن کاملA new philosophy of man and humanism
The theoretical basis for the new philosophy was laid by the American philosopher James Joseph Dagenais (1923-1981), who came to the conclusion that philosophical anthropology is not a science, but a domain unto itself, and that a philosophy of man can only come about as a joint undertaking of all sciences, in which the object of study must be man himself. The final explanation of man lies outs...
متن کاملThe philosophy of media and its role on the social education with emphasis on the “ reception” theory
One of the fundamental aspects of education is social education. This term of the education in consider to magnitude, complexity and comprehensiveness covering all educational institutions and overlooks the education of individuals, in one hand, develop individual character and the other hand, transmits heritage to the next generation. In the media field, one of the most fundamental questi...
متن کامل